logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.08.09 2017고정618
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From August 3, 2016 to April of the same month, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the accommodation of the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju City from around August 3, 2016 to the pention operated by the Victim D, resulting in an attempt to post a letter to slander the victim by accessing the website of the E-pention, and by linking with his own smartphone to the column of the trip of the E-penture with “the crossing, bath distance, and pre-contract load.”

', ‘ 날 짜 지난 간장을 그것도 2014년도 빌려주면서 인상 팍팍, 휴지 없다고 했더니 지랄 지랄, 저녁에 계단 불도 켜지지도 않고 계단에 불이 안 켜져 전치 2 주 나왔습니다.

The first day of this pen.

Adoringer shall be frightened once a week after the last one week, where there is no brush or fluort, and it shall be frightened every day.

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has the capacity to write down the bill.

absolute Megaves

In order to make up and slander the latter writing of the content “,” the victim’s reputation was revealed through an information and communications network, thereby impairing the fact openly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the screen of the closure of the accusation and the one-day text message between the parties thereto;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the same Act and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the contents and degree of the Defendant’s expression of criticism for the reason of sentencing, the fact that there is no change of circumstances after the issuance of a summary order, and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are shown in the records and arguments of the case

Defendant

Judgment on the Defense Counsel's argument

1. The alleged content expressed by the Defendant is the public interest of other consumers who can use the relevant pen.

arrow