A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 22, 2013, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that the victim C was entitled to phone calls, and that “The victim C borrowed money to be repaid.”

However, at the time, the Defendant received KRW 2.2 million through KRW 2.4 million each month, and there was no special revenue, and even if the sum of the loans borrowed from the lending company reaches KRW 3,00,000,00 each month, the Defendant committed about KRW 1.3 million each month. At the time, the Defendant was under a state of large consumption in the illegal sports entertainment entertainment, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the loan even if he borrowed money from the damaged party.

The defendant, as mentioned above, shall include the deception of the attached crime, including the deception of the victim and the 200,000 won from the victim's remittance and the defraudation of the victim's money.

1. A total of KRW 17,796,672, as described, was acquired by deception.

2. On February 3, 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim E would lend money to the victim E by telephone.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, at the time, the Defendant received KRW 2.2 million through KRW 2.4 million each month, and there was no special revenue, and even if the sum of the loans borrowed from the lending company reaches KRW 3,00,000,00 each month, the Defendant committed about KRW 1.3 million each month. At the time, the Defendant was under a state of large consumption in the illegal sports entertainment entertainment, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the loan even if he borrowed money from the damaged party.

Defendant 1, as above, a list of crimes in attached Form 2, including deceiving the victim and receiving 601,000 won from the damaged person on the same day by remittance.

2. A total of 88,092,000 won, as described, was acquired by deception.

3. On March 8, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation) against Victims E and smartphones.