1. The plaintiff B, C, and D shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff A's claim is dismissed.

3. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 12, 1982, the Plaintiffs submitted to the Defendant a written application for support for discharge from active service and transfer to another position, as shown below, while serving as warrant officers of the Air Force, by promoting them to Associate First Lieutenant, after serving as Staff Staff of the Air Force.

Plaintiff

A person who enters an education course for former support on the date he/she wishes to be discharged from active service, and on May 1, 2015 through May 31, 2015, 2015, B from June 1, 2014 to May 31, 2015, B from January 17, 2015, and C from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015, respectively.

Accordingly, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiffs to undergo vocational guidance, and Plaintiff A received vocational guidance from June 1, 2014, Plaintiff B, and C from April 1, 2014, and Plaintiff D received vocational guidance from March 1, 2014.

C. While receiving vocational support education, the Plaintiffs: (a) were receiving vocational support education; (b) the Plaintiff A; (c) the Plaintiff B; and (d) the Plaintiff C, November 10, 2014; and (c) the Plaintiff D, on November 9, 2014; and (c) the committee for examination on discharge from active service for the overall period of the year of 2015, respectively; (c) the committee for examination on discharge from active service of the Air Force Headquarters decided not to select the Plaintiffs as the honorary discharge from active service on January 15, 2015 on the ground that “the number of applicants is less than the number of applicants due to lack of the available budget for the temporary discharge from active service; and (d) the said resolution was notified to the Plaintiffs on January 22, 2015 through January 26, 2015.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant refusal to select the discharge from active service”). D.

On February 13, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a petition review with the National Military Personnel Management Review Committee of the Ministry of National Defense regarding the refusal of the appointment of honorary discharge.

E. On April 29, 2015, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to discharge the Plaintiff from military service on his/her wishes as of May 31, 2015, as of March 4, 2015, as of March 31, 2015, as of March 31, 2015, as of February 10, 2015, as of February 28, 2015.

(f) On June 2, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a petition review on personnel affairs with the Central Military Personnel Review Committee of the Ministry of National Defense seeking revocation of the instant disposition, but the Plaintiffs A dismissed on July 27, 2015.