Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 28, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.121% of alcohol level in the second-class parking lot of Hyundai Apartment 104 Dong-dong 104, in a small amount, from the parking lot of Geumcheon-si, which was located in the Dong of Gyeongcheon-si around 22:50 on October 28, 2016 to the 60-class water room of the same city.

2. On October 28, 2016, the Defendant damaged public documents: (a) at the second-class parking lot of Hyundai Apartment 104 Dong-dong, 104, in a small amount of 60 water-related water-related water-related water-related water-flowed in Switzerland, the Defendant: (b) after measuring drinking; (c) after requesting blood appraisal on his hand; (d) demanded that the Defendant sign a blood collection agreement as above at the 62th unit of the patrol 62th unit; (c) the Defendant would have impaired its utility by damaging the documents used by public offices by cutting down the water-related water-related water-related parking lot. (d) At the same time, the Defendant demanded that the Defendant sign a blood collection agreement as seen above at the 62th unit of the patrol 62th unit; and (e) demanded the Defendant to sign a blood collection agreement in good faith.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol and reporting on the situation of driving alcohol;

1. Notification of the results of regulating driving of drinking alcohol, a statement made under the circumstances of a driver of drinking alcohol, and written consent to blood collection;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (on-site photographs, etc.) and report internal investigation (the grounds for non-performance of blood collection);

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol) concerning criminal facts, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging public documents) and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to be contrary to this court’s reasoning, and the fact that the defendant seems to have no record of the same crime is the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, at the time of the defendant's driving.