The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor and two months, additional collection) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant led to his/her confession and reflects his/her offense.

However, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the same kind of narcotics crime in 2008 and completed the sentence after having been sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for the same kind of narcotics crime during the period of the suspension of the sentence. After having been sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of narcotics crime in 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to three gs and three gs and one gs and one gs and one gs of the crimes of this case (one gs and three gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs and one gs

In addition, considering all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, health status, character and conduct, environment, background of this case, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is deemed to be improper and too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.