beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and two months and suspension of qualifications for A, by imprisonment for up to eight months and suspension of qualifications for Defendant B, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A, on August 19, 201, called "I would make a tax official under the pretext of soliciting a case handled by public officials after receiving KRW 50 million,00,000,000 from H to the Nonghyup Bank account (L) account in the name of H on August 31, 201, while receiving KRW 30,000,000 from K on two occasions in total, including receiving KRW 20,000,000 from K to the Nonghyup Bank account (L) account in the name of K on September 19, 201.
"2014 Highest 1394"
1. The defendant B may not censorship any mail, wiretapping any telecommunications or record or listen to any conversations between others that are not open to the public, without going through the provisions of Acts such as the Protection of Communications Secrets Act;
On January 29, 2014, from around 14:38 to 364, the Defendant filed a criminal charge of embezzlement against Defendant A at the 2nd 2nd 2nd 363 unit of the - government prosecutor’s office, which had been able to see from 14:38 to 364, the Defendant had Defendant A go through a cell phone of the Defendant in order to hear the conversation, and had Defendant go through a cell phone for about seven hours from that time to 22:51 at the parking lot of the - public prosecutor’s office, etc.
Accordingly, the defendant listened to the conversation between others that are not open to the public.
2. In order to assist Defendant A in hearing conversations between prosecutor M, prosecutorial assistant N, and H that Defendant B is not open to the public, as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, Defendant A aided and abetted Defendant B by walking a phone in the mobile phone in advance at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) so that Defendant B can hear conversations between prosecutor M, prosecutorial assistant N, and H through a cell phone and facilitating the relevant crime.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ each.