beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion
A. The Plaintiff entered into a business trust agreement with D, which is an Internet communications business entity, and was engaged in the business of attracting subscribers to communications services provided by D. Defendant B, from September 20, 2016 to May 31, 2018, and Defendant C, from December 14, 2016 to March 8, 2018, were discharged from the Plaintiff Company’s business team.
B. The Defendants are liable for tort or nonperformance against the Plaintiff for the following reasons.
1) The Defendants continued to indicate false facts with the content of slandering the Plaintiff Company and another team leader of the Plaintiff Company at the “E” group or reading room used by the 2st team members for business purposes. Accordingly, the employees of the 2nd team members who had been connected to the said reading room should retire from the Plaintiff Company with stress and employed the Plaintiff Company from time to time (Interference with the Plaintiff Company). (2) The Plaintiff Company offered 10,000 number of the Plaintiff Company to use the F 10,000 number as it is, and claimed the business of using the F 10,000 number as it was, and this was not illegal business.
However, around March 2018, the Defendants posted a false article stating that they engage in illegal business in the Plaintiff Company on the bulletin board “Cheongdae National Newspapers”, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s honor and preventing the Plaintiff from running the said number mobile business.
(3) Defendant B paid fees to the Plaintiff Company even though the customer G is not eligible for the payment of fees (i.e., tort in occupational breach of trust or nonperformance of employment contract). (4) The Plaintiff Company deposited and managed the deposit money received from the customer into the passbook in the name of H in the convenience of the customer’s deposit account. However, Defendant C submitted a copy of the passbook in the name of H in the competent tax office, and the Plaintiff used the borrowed account for the purpose of tax evasion by falsely reporting that the Plaintiff Company was unjust.