logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.01.20 2016고정689
업무방해등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On June 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 02:00, at “E” ranran tavern operated by the victim D (E, 51 years of age) located on the 1st underground floor in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yongsan-gu, Seoul; and (b) on the ground that the victim was hedging with the Defendant’s friendship, whether he/she will engage in funeral services at such Chewing year, width, and a third party.

It shall be discarded away from the triarche area.

“The victim’s singke business was obstructed by force for about 30 minutes, such as putting sound, singing out a small wave, making visitors visit, etc.

B. The Defendant around 01:00 on August 9, 2015, at the same place as above, “this Chewing year,” is immediately harmful to the Defendant.

Whether or not funeral services will be rendered at this place.

The victim's ranran bar business was obstructed for about 10 minutes by marching a sound called "a bit of a bit of bit of a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a

2. In around 02:00 on July 28, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim openly by stating that “The victim is a victim’s employee F at the workplace where the victim’s staff member F is “this Chewing year, poppy, and night road d...”

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1-A.]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made D in the second examination protocol of the suspect against the accused during the police investigation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Partial statements made to F in the police statement protocol;

1. A report on investigation (a statement from a witness) (a fact set forth in judgment No. 1-B);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made D in the second examination protocol of the suspect against the accused during the police investigation protocol;

1. A detailed statement of 112 reported cases (the fact under subparagraph 2 of the judgment) (the receipt of August 9, 2015)

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made D in the second examination protocol of the suspect against the accused during the police investigation protocol;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and the Criminal Act for the selection of criminal facts;

arrow