logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.08 2015가단123470
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) from July 18, 2015 to Plaintiff A, KRW 21,228,57 to Plaintiff B and C, respectively, and each of them.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 22, 2015, the network E (hereinafter “the deceased”) died at the National Cancer Center located in 323 Goyang-gu, Manyang-si, Manyang-si, Manyang-si on a 323 basis.

B. As the wife and children of the deceased, the Plaintiffs jointly inherited the deceased’s property as the statutory inheritance portion.

C. Before the deceased died, the Defendant was living together with the deceased for a long time in the housing located in the Gangseo-gun F of the Gangwon-gun.

On June 23, 2015, the Defendant was in custody of the NongHyup Bank, a seal imprint, a cash withdrawal card, and an Internet banking card in the name of the deceased at the time of the death of the deceased, and was immediately after the death of the deceased, the Defendant introduced Nonparty G deceased and the Defendant to Nonparty G deceased on June 23, 2015.

On the 24th of the same month, the sum of KRW 5.5 million was withdrawn, and the sum was transferred to the Defendant’s deposit account. On the 25th of the same month, the sum of KRW 18 million was transferred to the Defendant’s deposit account again on the 25th of the same month. In addition, on June 24, 2015, the sum of KRW 75.3 million was withdrawn from the Deceased’s KB National Bank Account from June 24, 2015 to the Defendant’s deposit account.

E. On June 25, 2015, the Defendant deposited KRW 1 million into the deposit account in the name of the deceased.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry between 1 and 4 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs, which are the cause of the claim, primarily, seek damages from co-inheritors in accordance with their respective shares of inheritance on the premise that the marriage of the Plaintiff A and the Deceased is valid.

According to the above facts of recognition as to the deceased, the plaintiffs jointly inherited the deceased's property due to the death of the deceased, and the defendant did not obtain the consent of the plaintiffs, who are the deceased's property successors.

arrow