Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment of the court below (ten months of imprisonment) is too unfasible, and the prosecutor is too unfased and unreasonable.

2. Not only several times the Defendant had been punished for larceny, but also committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to larceny, etc. The Defendant is disadvantageous to the Defendant. The Defendant has led to the confession and rebuttal of all the instant crime, and the Defendant agreed with G, the victim, and the Defendant’s audio activity, the remainder of the damage goods, was temporarily returned, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

In full view of comprehensively examining various circumstances that serve as conditions for sentencing, such as age and happiness environment of the defendant, including the above poor circumstances, the lower court’s sentence appears to be reasonable. Therefore, the allegation of unfair sentencing by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided