logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.22 2016고단5222
폭행치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) laid the bridge of Section C, which is a workplace club fee, on the president of the bathing beach sand, while holding a combined event with the bridge, on June 10, 2016, on the west-to-west, which is located in the west-to-west, at the time of the economicization of around 22:00; and (b) the victim D went beyond the staff of the Korean team.

“The victims of the defect in the subsection of this paragraph brought about injury to the victim, putting about 12 weeks to the right sloping, which requires treatment of the victim.” The victim suffered injury, such as reheat, which is the stoves of the right stoves.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Copies of medical certificates and medical records;

1. Details of conversations with a domain;

1. Details of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue with the F director;

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Details of benefits for medical care;

1. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence revealed earlier, the Defendant’s act of assault and bodily injury can be acknowledged as having committed a crime of injury resulting from assault and bodily injury on the part of the Defendant, inasmuch as the Defendant’s act of assault and bodily injury can be acknowledged.

(1) E, a witness on the spot at the time, has gone beyond the victim's bridge.

statement is made.

② On June 11, 2016, at around 16:02, the victim sent and received F and Stockholm messages, a workplace club fee, and the Defendant sent and received a message to the effect that knee did not know that knee had the right seal on the wind facing the bridge.

③ The victim received medical treatment at G Hospital on June 13, 2016, and the victim found the hospital on the said date is no longer a day after the accident occurred, and the victim, who is not an emergency patient at the end of the day, was to find kneeless specialized hospital on the day after the accident.

④ On the day following the occurrence of this case, the Defendant.

arrow