1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, the indication 4, 5, 6, 8, 4 of the same list.

According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including various numbers), the plaintiff provided a lease contract (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case") with the lease deposit amount of KRW 3,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 250,000, monthly rent of KRW 250,000, and the period of two years on February 16, 2008 with respect to the portion of KRW 17.4 square meters in the same list among the real estate listed in the separate sheet in the name of husband C (hereinafter "the building of this case") among the real estate listed in the separate sheet in the name of husband C, and the plaintiff provided a notification to the defendant on several occasions of the termination of the lease contract from August 22, 2013 to January 15, 2015, the sum of the amount of unjust enrichment from April 15, 2012 to October 16, 2015; and the defendant provided a notification to the defendant on several occasions.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract of this case was terminated on or around August 22, 2013, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff, and the defendant is obligated to pay unjust enrichment calculated by the ratio of KRW 8,500,000 per month from January 17, 2015 to the completion date of delivery of the building of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.