1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 19, 1966, the Plaintiff’s husband B (hereinafter “the deceased”) entered the Army and participated in Vietnam from August 16, 1969 to September 4, 1970, and discharged the Plaintiff from military service on March 29, 1972.

B. On March 10, 1997, the Deceased filed an application for the registration of patients suffering from defoliants with respect to “pulphism, neutism, chronic hemosis, nephism, and eutism,” and received the judgment on “pulmatic disorder” as a result of the disability grade assessment on May 4, 1998.

C. In addition, on May 13, 2011, the Deceased filed an application for re-examination of “fluoral transfusion, cerebral chronology,” and on November 29, 201, the Deceased was recognized as actual aftereffects of defoliants, as to “mathal urine,” and “mathal urine,” but the result of the physical examination was determined as falling short of the standards.

On February 9, 2012, the Deceased was determined as having been able to “high level” by being additionally recognized as potential aftereffects of defoliants with respect to malicious species on or around February 9, 2012. On July 12, 2014, the death of the deceased and the direct death of the death diagnosis report is deemed as “Weekin cancer, bronite cancer (e.g., liver and pulmonon cancer).”

E. Meanwhile, the medical examination of the Central Veterans Hospital issued on July 21, 2014, after the deceased’s death, is a patient who was diagnosed with urine disease before six years’ in the column of future medical examination and treatment opinion in the column of “the detailed unknown chronic kidney diseases accompanied by the sulinininine-nurine urine’s urine and other detailed kidney diseases,” and was continuously diagnosed with urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine urine dynasium

The term "" is written as "."

F. On July 29, 2014, the Plaintiff, a spouse of the Deceased, filed an application for registration of bereaved families of patients suffering from actual aftereffects of defoliants with the Defendant, claiming that the Deceased died of urology, the actual aftereffects of defoliants. On August 4, 2014, the Defendant registered urology, the deceased’s actual aftereffects of defoliants, to the Plaintiff.