logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고단5063
폭행등
Text

The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,50,00,00 for the crime Nos. 1 and 2 in accordance with the judgment of the court.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution on October 21, 2014 by the Suwon District Court for violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapons, threats, etc.) and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 21, 2014.

[2014 Highest 5063]

1. The Defendant, at around 11:40 on June 3, 2014, uses assault against the victim D, damage to property, and obstruction of business with respect to the Defendant, without any reason, at the “Fda” operated by the victim D (the age of 49) located in the wife E (the wife population) one time at the right head of the victim’s right head on the hand floor, and at the distance of the plastic material on the consignee, one and two misunderstandings are placed in the left part of the victim’s left part.

The defendant continued to throw down the wind and safes of the victim's possession on the floor, and incidental to the garrising light, etc. leading to drinking in a multi-bank.

After all, the Defendant assaulted the victim at the time of the above, destroyed the imprisonment without prison labor, etc. owned by the victim, and obstructed the victim's multi-faceted business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 20 minutes.

[2014 Highest 6794]

2. Around 16:19 on May 30, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim D, on the ground that “I am dynasium” means “I am dynasium, I am dynasium, I am dynasium, I am dynasium, and I am dynasium, and I am dynasium, I am dynasium, I am dynasium, and I am dynasium, I interfered with the victim’s multiple business by force by avoiding disturbances for 5 to 10 minutes.

3. The Defendant against the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. against the Victim D, in the course of demanding a written agreement to the victim D with respect to the crime set forth in paragraph (1), the Defendant sent text messages on several occasions on June 2014 to the cellular phone used by the victim D, or submitted a written agreement for “the telephone call,” and the request is

arrow