logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.09.21 2017고단1431
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 10, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 on the grounds of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving), etc. in the support for the development of the Sugwon method, and on October 28, 2016, the Defendant is a person who has violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as being sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) on the grounds of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the support for the development of the Sugwon method.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a c bargaining car.

On April 7, 2017, the Defendant, without a driver's license, 0.198% of alcohol concentration in blood, 0.198%, fluencing and smelled, and her walking is difficult to drive normally, such as flucing and smelling red on the non-distance and face. On the world, the Defendant driven the said car and driving the car at the intersection of the private distance in front of the apartment flucing apartment in front of the front of the lucing apartment at the lucing and lucing lucing lucing lucing lucing lucing lucing lucing luc.

However, since the signal at a private distance intersection is installed, and the central line is installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely proceed with the signal in accordance with the new code by properly operating the front line and the left and right, and by accurately operating the steering direction and the brake system, and not harming the central line, and to proceed to the right-hand side of the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence, violated the signal of the red stop of the above intersection by neglecting such duty of care, and suffered bodily injury, such as the victim's Ethbluri vehicle's front flick part of the victim's Ethluri vehicle, which was stopped for the left-hand turn turn at the right-hand turn line in line with the direction of the Defendant's running, following the Defendant's failure of such duty of care.

arrow