(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2015.01.14 2014가단103424

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2015.01.14 2014가단103424

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 10, 2009, the designated Chinese origin C, as the introduction of D, married with the Plaintiff on April 10, 2009, and went out around March 2010, and divorced from the Plaintiff on July 15, 2010.

B. The Appointed C married with the Defendant (Appointed Party) on January 13, 2011.

[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the claim

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion C married with the Defendant (Appointed Party) who was married with the Plaintiff without a will to marry with the Plaintiff, and the Defendant (Appointed Party) committed an unlawful act, such as committing a sexual act with the appointed party C with the knowledge that the appointed party C was married with the Plaintiff, and eventually, caused the appointed party C to leave home and divorce, thereby causing the failure of the marital community and having the appointed party C marry marry marry divorce.

Therefore, the Defendants are obliged to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the said tort.

B. As recognized in paragraph (1), as recognized in paragraph (1) of the judgment, the following facts can be recognized: (a) the Appointed C was married and married to the Plaintiff and divorced from the Defendant; and (b) the Defendant was married.

Furthermore, the Selection C was married with the Plaintiff without the intention of marriage.

With respect to whether the failure of the marital life of the plaintiff and the appointed party C due to the act of the defendant (appointed party), it is not sufficient to recognize the failure solely based on the facts acknowledged earlier in light of the health care unit, the marriage process, the circumstance of the failure and the circumstances before and after the failure, etc. recognized by the statement in subparagraph 2, and the written evidence in the evidence Nos. 7, 8, and 14, and there is no other evidence to prove

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit without further review.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party is dismissed as it is without merit.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.09 2017가단32372

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.21 2017가단70497

-광주지방법원 2017.12.19 2017가단509183

-의정부지방법원 2014.11.06 2013나52975

-부산지방법원서부지원 2019.07.10 2018가단108580