logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.01.24 2017고단1915
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On December 17, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime of around 22:50 on December 17, 2017, from around 22:48 to around 22:58 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business operation for about 10 minutes of the restaurant by force by force by the victim D (E, 54 years of age) under the influence of alcohol on the ground that the said victim was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol. The Defendant: (a) dumping the beer’s disease in the air conditioning; (b) dumped the beer’s inside the air conditioning; (c) laid the beer’s house on the floor; and (d) laid the beer’s beer’s beer’s beer; and (d) laid the beer’s beer’s beer’s beer at the inner bottom; and (d) dumped the said restaurant.

B. On December 17, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime at around 23:25 on December 17, 2017, 2017: from around 23:25 on December 17, 2017 to 23:30 on the same day, and finds again in the restaurant as indicated in the above paragraph (1) and opens an empty bottle number at the entrance of the said restaurant without any reason, at the empty box where the Defendant was placed at the entrance of the said restaurant.

In order to prevent customers from entering the above restaurant, it interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force by placing the disturbance on the front floor of the above restaurant, breaking off the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string, thereby hindering customers from entering the restaurant.

2. On November 6, 2017, around 10:35, the Defendant destroyed the above banner equivalent to 40,000 won at the market price by discovering a banner with the content of “G” installed by the victim F in front of the Donnam-si, Donnam-si, the Donnam-si, the Donnam-si, the Donnam-si, the Donnam-si, the Donnam-si, the Donnam-si, and destroying the said banner by setting fire to the said banner

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Photographss and receipts of each damage;

1. On-site reports (afusing and attachingCCTV images);

1. Response to a request for cooperation in investigation (the table of 112 Report Processing Cases) applying statutes;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

arrow