(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2021.01.11 2020고정183

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2021.01.11 2020고정183

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2020, the Defendant, at the C main point located in Thai-gun B around 22:00, performed alcohol and flaged with the victim D (the victim South and the age of 36) with the victim D (the victim South and the age of 36), was flaging the victim's face by gathering the flag remaining flag on the part of the victim's head and flaging the victim's head, thereby causing the victim's injury, such as the injury of the flag and the impairment of the gladity of oral surgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness D and E’s legal statement, and the witness F’s legal statement;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, E, and F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. On-site photographs and damaged photographs (the Defendant did not have any scam of the victim’s head debt, and the victim made an insulting speech to the Defendant’s wife and scam the victim took a scam of the victim’s head debt, and the victim took a scam of the victim’s scambling, and the victim took a scam of the scambling part. However, the court may fully recognize the facts of injury by taking account of the following facts and circumstances revealed

(1) The victim consistently stated from an investigative agency to this court that the Defendant was suffering from suffering from suffering from suffering from suffering from suffering from suffering from suffering from suffering from suffering from suffering from sufferings, and subsequently, the victim made a statement that the Defendant was suffering from sufferings from sufferings from sufferings.

(2) A witness E, who was in the main place, considered the defendant's head as a head of the victim.

The statement is more consistent with the victim's statement than the defendant's defense.

The victim and E are in a relatively neutral position among the witnesses of this case to the extent that they have mutual understanding, and there is no reason to present false testimony at the risk of punishment for perjury.

3. F, the principal store operator, was in preparation for food at the kitchen, and the Defendant was in preparation for food at the kitchen, and the Defendant was in preparation for the head of the victim.

The statement also supports the statements of the victim.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2021.1.11. 선고 2020고정183 판결

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.10.25 2017고단343

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.17 2019고정974

-인천지방법원 2014.10.02 2014노2742

-의정부지방법원 2016.07.21 2016고정809