logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.09 2017구합10203
공장 증설 및 업종변경(추가) 불승인 처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff filed the instant application with the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea and 7

) The cement plant (hereinafter referred to as “the cement plant of this case”) is called “the cement plant of this case”

(2) On September 30, 2016, the Plaintiff applied for the extension of a factory with a total of 43,496.82 square meters of the building area (hereinafter “instant ready-mixed factory”) to the Defendant on the instant site, and the extension of a factory for adding a ready-mixed manufacturing business (hereinafter “instant business”) to the existing type of business and approval for change of the type of business.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant application”) (No. 1). B.

On October 18, 2016, the Defendant rejected the instant application to the Plaintiff for the following reasons.

(hereinafter “Disposition” 1) (No. 1) (No. 1) (No. 1) (the site of this case was located in the area where population is concentrated ( approximately 4,136 generations 9,494). The site of this case is about 700 persons in the area around the site of this case and 14 related agencies, and there are major roads, commercial buildings, farmland, etc. - The site of this case is located on the site of this case with the cement factory of this case, which would deteriorate commercial education environment due to noise dust, etc., impair urban landscape, and damage to roads, traffic accidents, traffic congestion, and traffic congestion caused by the increase of large vehicles, and the site of this case is likely to cause the infringement of students’ right to learn around the site of this case (the site of this case) and the site of this case, which is likely to cause the infringement of students’ right to learn around the site of this case.

arrow