The defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two months for each crime of fraud against the victim B, and is punished by fraud against the victim C.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 6, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 14, 2016.

[2018 Highest 5308]

1. On September 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B by phoneing the victim B on September 2016, stating, “I would have a large sports game company in Singapore to connect with this place. The use of the game site requires KRW 200 million as a security deposit.”

However, in fact, there is no need for deposit to use the above game site.

On September 12, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 330 million won from the E bank account (Account Number F) in the name of D on two occasions on September 12, 2016, and acquired by transfer the total of 19 billion won from October 19, 2016, from that time, from that time to October 19, 2016.

2. On April 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant on phone to the Defendant, stating, “If the funds for the business operated by Singapore are insufficient, then the Defendant will receive money from the fund team managed by Singapore and complete payment within the scope of the funds.”

However, the defendant was not running business in Singapore, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it.

On May 10, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 200 million from the victim to the H bank account (Account Number I) in the name of G on four occasions.

3. On June 2017, the Defendant called the Defendant on the phone to the Defendant, saying, “If the expenses required for the business operated by Singapore are 1 billion won, but the funds are still insufficient, 4 billion won was invested in the business related to the Hong Kong subway, and the funds are to be repaid after one month thereafter.”

However, the defendant is Singapore.