A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 3.5 million won due to a violation of road traffic law (driving), and was sentenced to a summary order of 5 million won due to a violation of road traffic law (driving), and on January 12, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 5 million won due to a violation of road traffic law (driving), and on March 12, 2013, at the Seobu branch branch of the Daegu District Court of the Daegu District Court of the Daegu District of the Daegu District of the District of the District of the District of the District of the Daegu of the District of the District of the District of the District of the District of the Daegu of the District of the District of the District of the District of the District

On November 7, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.169% during blood transfusion, driven BSP car at approximately one kilometer from approximately 1 kilometer to approximately 31-gil, Seogu, Daegu-gu and CU convenience store located in 31-37, in front of the instant cafeteria.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver making a drinking, inquiry about the results of crackdown on drinking driving, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, report on the circumstances of the driver making a drinking, response to inquiries about criminal history, summary order, and application of the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (In consideration of the fact that the accused has no criminal record exceeding the same kind of fine);