logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.11.22 2016고단3374
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

400,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The amount equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to three years in Seoul Central District Court for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on June 10, 2014.

The Defendant, who is not a person handling narcotics, did not possess, possess, receive, use, transport, control, import, export, prepare, prepare, administer, administer, administer, sell, trade, or arrange the trade of, or provide, a psychotropic drug, a psychotropic drug, (hereinafter referred to as “clopon”). However, the Defendant traded a copon as follows.

At around 20:00 on January 22, 2015, the Defendant received 400,000 won from E to an account in the name of F in the purchase price of philop from E to an account in the name of F, and sold philopon to E, which includes 1g of philopon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect E by the prosecution;

1. Photographs of text messages (related to the price of writingphones);

1. A criminal investigation report (the details of the inspection direction), response data from a single bank, personal information inquiry, and details of transactions;

1. Previous convictions: References to criminal records and investigation reports (applicable to criminal records of the same kind of suspect, written judgments and summary orders);

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under the relevant Acts on criminal facts, and selection of imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2010, Jan. 2, 2011) are not the basic area (one year to two years) (one year to two years), including the grounds for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2010, Feb.

However, in light of the initial statement of the investigative agency that voluntarily enters the investigative agency with the knowledge of the violation, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the defendant is under investigation.

arrow