logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.10 2019고합95
변호사법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

10,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

As to the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged were appropriately revised to the extent that it does not affect the defendant's right of defense.

On May 2018, the Defendant heard from the victim D, who became aware of business relations at the 14th Seoul Gangnam-gu Office C Office of 14th floor in Seoul, that the former Vice-President F was investigated at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office due to the suspicion of the violation of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act, etc. The Defendant was aware of the high-ranking prosecutor's officers, and was able to make solicitation or solicitation to the persons related to the prosecution who are in charge of the above case and receive an investigation evasion or good offices by soliciting or arranging them, and received money and valuables from the victim on the pretext of accepting money and valuables from the victim and soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials.

From May 2018 to June 12, 2018, the Defendant, directly or through mobile phones, etc., concluded as KRW 100 million, “The F case can be sufficiently resolved by using this kind of relationship with the senior executives of the prosecution. Using this kind of relationship, F shall be based on its cost, 40 million won shall be notified of the total cost following the identification of the case, and shall be notified of the total cost.” “The Defendant was informed of the fact that the Defendant was dysing back to, and dysing out, the remaining side and the said branch office at the lower side of the case, and dysing out, with no big error,” “I will be suspended from prosecution,” and “I would be 100 million won to be “I would not know the money for solving the case, and if so, I would be able to have an unexpected impact on each case under investigation, or from the relevant public prosecutor or from the public prosecutor, as if there is no big error in the F’s criminal investigation cost or treatment of the case.”

However, it is true.

arrow