Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants expressed that, between C and D, most of the people accommodated in a low telecom are in a bad-wheeled relationship. As such, the Defendants agreed to collect money by means of threatening their family members by walking a phone number attached to a vehicle parked in the telecom and threatening to inform them of the unknown fact. Defendant A and D agreed to share the role of receiving money from victims, Defendant B, the vehicle number of the vehicle parked in the telecom, and the telephone number attached to the vehicle in the telecom, and notify C of the fact that they would have known the victims of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact of the fact

Accordingly, Defendant B sent the victim E (ma, 61 years of age)’s vehicle number and his phone number attached to the vehicle to C, which was taken from the mutual infest telecom in Sinpo-dong, Sinpo-si, and C sent KRW 2,80,000,000 to the agricultural bank account in the name of Defendant A around February 25, 2013, on the following grounds: (a) on February 18, 2013, Defendant B called “if he does not transfer KRW 5,00,000 to his family members, he would know of the influence relation by sending the photograph of the new vehicle taken from the mother to E; and (b) on February 25, 2013, Defendant B transferred KRW 2,80,000 to the agricultural bank account in the name of Defendant A

In addition, the Defendants conspired with C and D, from February 25, 2013 to May 13, 2013, in collusion with C and D, by threatening the victims at least seven times in total, such as the list of crimes in the annexed crime list, and did not receive a total of KRW 10,800,000, or did not commit it, or did not commit it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol of Defendant A’s suspect interrogation protocol regarding D, F, D, and G

1. Each police statement made to H, E, and I;

1. Each screen and each photograph;