logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017.09.20 2015나14104
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant was merged with the Korea National Housing Corporation (Korea Land and Housing Corporation on October 1, 2009) on September 10, 2008.

The "Housing Corporation" shall be referred to as "Housing Corporation" regardless of whether it is before or after the merger.

(C) From November 3, 2008 to February 20, 2011, the construction period of C Formation Project in the Changwon-si District was set at KRW 18,794,953,00 of the construction amount (the last construction period was extended on December 30, 201, and the construction amount was increased to KRW 19,847,03,000 of the construction amount.

(2) On December 23, 2008, the Defendant provided a subcontract for a reinforced concrete construction work to A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”) by setting the construction period of construction from December 23, 2008 to February 20, 201, with the construction cost of KRW 1,043,00,000, respectively; and provided a subcontract for a reinforced concrete construction work as the construction period from December 23, 2008 to February 20, 201, with the construction cost of KRW 981,310,000, respectively.

(hereinafter “instant subcontract”). (b)

The contents of the subcontract agreement between the Defendant and A are amended several times, and the Defendant and A finally drafted the subcontract modification agreement (No. 2-8 and No. 3-9) and the settlement agreement (No. 2-9, No. 3-10) with the subcontract construction period from December 23, 2008 to December 30, 2011. Accordingly, the Defendant settled the settlement agreement with the subcontractor and the settlement agreement (No. 1,779,712,90, and the settlement agreement for reinforced concrete construction, KRW 2,692,182,90 among the subcontracted construction of this case, KRW 297, KRW 297, KRW 292, KRW 249, KRW 297, KRW 292, KRW 297, KRW 292, KRW 297, KRW 297, KRW 292, KRW 297, KRW 297, KRW 297, KRW 2192, KRW 297, and KRW 297.

C. 1 Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s seizure and collection order, is aggregated in A.

arrow