Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On October 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on April 25, 2013, and the said judgment was finalized on the 31st of the same month.
【Criminal Facts】
At around 20:00 on September 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) suffered injury to the victim G (56 years of age) that the Defendant and F f f f f f g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;
1. An investigation report (or a relative investigation of a witness H) and an investigation report (or an investigation of a witness I);
1. A copy of medical records, a copy of the nursing information survey site, and a medical certificate;
1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of statutes governing judgment;
1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. As to the Defendant’s assertion on the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserts that he was unilaterally assaulted by workers at the time of the instant case and did not inflict any injury on the victim.
The following facts acknowledged by the evidence revealed as follows: (a) it is evident that the victim was injured by cerebrovasin, etc. while going beyond the back at the time of the instant case; and (b) the Defendant stated in the investigative agency that the victim was unaware of the injury at the time of the instant case; (c) however, the Defendant was trying to leave the scene after the victim was injured, and thus, the victim was placed in the vicinity so that he could not leave the scene.