1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance for this case are as follows: G 1735.6m2 (G 5041m2, G 5041m2, G 504.6m3m2, before the previous racing-si, G and J as it was divided into May 24, 2002). The Plaintiff’s partial testimony of the witness H and the result of reply to an order to submit financial transaction information to the outside agricultural cooperative head of this court is not sufficient to recognize that there was a title trust agreement as alleged by the Plaintiff, and the Defendant’s purchase of the remaining shares of the above land was not jointly disputed between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the above Defendant’s purchase of the remaining shares of the land at the 205m2, E.3m2, from D Co., Ltd., on April 18, 2002, and the Defendant’s purchase of the remaining shares of the land at the 305m205m2,57m2, as the Plaintiff and the remaining shares of the Plaintiff’s purchase.

In other words, the testimony of witness H is added to “the testimony of the first instance court witness H” of the fifth 9th e.g., “the result of response to the order to submit financial transaction information to the outside agricultural cooperative of this court and the witness H” of the fifth e.g., the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the first instance judgment. As such, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is concluded.