The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment, one hundred thousand won of additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition that the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case, reflects the fact that the defendant is under the confession of all of the crimes of this case, and the defendant is under the influence that his health has deteriorated after performing surgery due to blood satisfying satisfying satisfy, etc., but the defendant has been punished three times for the same crime (two times of imprisonment with prison labor, one time of suspended execution). The defendant committed the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime after having been sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime (one year and two months of imprisonment). The defendant committed the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime. The proper recommended range of punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee relating to the crime of this case [basic crime: Type 3 (b) among the medication, simple possession, etc. of narcotics crime group, Type 3 (f) of imprisonment with prison labor within the previous three years, and the previous area of aggravated punishment] is deemed to have been sentenced beyond the minimum sentence of punishment, considering the favorable circumstances of the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.