logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.21 2018나67963
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. With respect to the Plaintiff’s C Vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Vehicle”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to D Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s Vehicle”).

B. On April 17, 2018, around 11:55, the Plaintiff’s vehicle waiting at a one-lane, the right-hand turn-on road in the direction of the e elementary school, among the six-lane roads in the direction of the eth, in the direction of the eth and the left-hand turn-hand turn-on to the two-lane road in accordance with the new subparagraph. On the basis of the instant intersection, the two-lanes in the direction of the eth and the two-lanes of the eth two-lanes in the direction of the Eth 6-lane in the direction of the Eth 6-lane in the direction of the Eth eth from the direction of the Eth 6-lane to the two-lane road in the direction of the Eth eth gate.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

After the instant accident, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,063,00 as the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle on April 26, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Items A 1 through 4, Eul 1 through 3 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The following circumstances revealing the fact of the negligence ratio in relation to the instant accident and the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence revealed, namely, ① the Defendant’s driver, in violation of Article 25(1) of the Road Traffic Act, which provides that the Defendant’s driver shall drive the Defendant’s vehicle to make a right-hand side along the intersection and drive the right-hand side of the intersection, leading the Defendant’s vehicle to a part of the two-lane road in the direction of the E elementary school while driving the right-hand side in violation of Article 25(1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the Plaintiff’s driver is shocking the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and ② in the process of making a left-hand turn, the Defendant’s vehicle is leeped by the right-hand side of the two-lane road.

arrow