logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.10.22 2015고정145
폭행
Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

On October 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won as a crime of assault in the support for the Daejeon Incheon District on the family register, and the Defendant was convicted of four times of violence.

1. At around 13:35 on October 25, 2014, the Defendant sent the victim E (here, 18 years of age) who is an employee at the D convenience store located in Jinjin-si C, and without any justifiable reason, the Defendant sent the victim the victim’s answer that “I am hyna, Sal, Sal, Myal, and Ear, anywhere in any year, I am hyna, I am hyna,” and “I am hyna, I am hyna, I am hyna, and I am hyna’s head to the victim’s head to the victim.”

2. On October 25, 2014, around 18:30 on October 25, 2014, the Defendant assaulted one time on the left side of the victim F (the age of 4 years) on the street without any justifiable reason while drunkly walking along the street in the 15 luxical movable property, the Defendant used the inside side of the victim F (the age of 4) on the street without any reason.

Judgment

According to the records, the defendant can be found to have been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months from the date of suspension of execution and medical treatment and custody on October 3, 2015 for criminal facts that habitually assaulted or injured victims during the period from October 17, 2014 to December 1, 2014, from the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court on June 24, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 3, 2015.

However, in light of the criminal facts of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, which became final and conclusive, and the criminal facts of the crime of this case are habitually committed during the above period, and in light of the criminal records of the defendant or the criminal attitude of the defendant, it is reasonable to view that the defendant used violence against the victims by the damp wall. Thus, the criminal facts of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, which became final and conclusive, and the facts charged of this case committed prior to the

Therefore, the facts charged of this case are as follows.

arrow