logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.11.06 2018나2069395
물품대금
Text

1. Revocation of the judgment of the first instance, and the plaintiff's primary claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff raised objection.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the facts is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (from 2th to 4th 7th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e).

2. The parties' assertion

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Upon entering into the instant transaction agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant B agreed to purchase goods on behalf of the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant B’s obligation. Pursuant to the said agreement, the Plaintiff transferred 1,540,550,000 won to the bank account in the name of E in total to KRW 1,540,51,000, or the amount transferred to the bank account in the name of E in total to KRW 1,540,550,000, and the Plaintiff did not dispute this amount of KRW 1,540,550,000, which was transferred to the account in the name of E in the instant case, KRW 1,540,50,000, and KRW 1,540,000, KRW 600, KRW 700, KRW 600, KRW 4000, KRW 500, and thus, the Plaintiff supplied the said goods to the Defendants.

arrow