logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.02 2016노8601
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

All appeals by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that the defense counsel recognized the mistake of the Defendant, the Defendant committed the instant crime by contingently, and the Defendant’s preliminary conviction before marriage, etc., the sentence of the lower court that sentenced to orders to complete sexual assault treatment programs for a period of 8 months and 40 hours is too unreasonable.

B. It is not good for the prosecutor to commit the instant crime, and the defendant F makes a false statement in the course of the first investigation.

In light of the fact that the court below denied the crime and did not compensate for the damage, and the victims want to be punished by the defendant, it is unfair that the sentence of the court below is too uneasible.

2. The Defendant provided money in the form of a sponsor against two female students who are college students.

In the process of making a false speech, the victim's body is taken by using anless camera case which is installed in the cell phone against the will of the victims, and the victim's body is taken after shooting the victim's body, and if it is not taken again to the F, the photograph taken above will be disseminated.

The crime is not good, the victims wanted to punish the defendant, and the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 5,00,000 won in the Seoul Central District Court on January 13, 2014 due to the violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (obscenity spread) at the Seoul Central District Court on the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., and there are several occasions of criminal punishment. On the other hand, the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's mistake, the defendant's preliminary father and his family members going against the defendant's preference to the defendant's wife, and other various factors stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the motive and background of each of the crimes of this case, the circumstances before and after the crimes of this case, the degree of damage, and the character and conduct of the defendant as shown in the records and arguments, etc

arrow