The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In determining facts, the Defendant: (a) promised to receive money from G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) to receive money from the Victim Countermeasure Committee (hereinafter “instant Countermeasure Committee”); (b) did not deal with legal affairs, such as legal consultation and preparation of legal documents; and (c) did not have embezzled the funds of the Countermeasure Committee by consuming them for personal purposes; and (d) did not err in the lower judgment convicting the Defendant.

B. The sentence of unfair sentencing (two-year imprisonment) of the lower court is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. (1) Determination of misunderstanding of facts is based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the court below, and the court below, and the following circumstances, i.e., the defendant knew of the fact that the defendant created a meeting from G to F, etc. around July 2009, the defendant participated in the above meeting while there are many members of the above meeting and there are only one kind of actions related to the lawsuit, and thereafter, on August 2009, the defendant was in charge of the position of the standing vice president at the Countermeasure Committee established by the above group (Evidence record 2762,2763). ② The F, the executive officer of the Countermeasure Committee, and P, the investigative agency, stated that the defendant participated in the Countermeasure Committee of this case by 10% out of the expected damages amount of 14 billion won (Evidence evidence record 1865, 165, 165, and 3.0% of the amount of the compensation of this case against the defendant 160% of the amount of the compensation of this case.