1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 1,037,572,046 and KRW 1,031,413,60 among them.

1. Determination as to Defendant A, Defendant C, D, and E

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(B) The defendant F was withdrawn from action.

(1) Judgment by service by public notice of the defendant A corporation: Judgment by public notice of the defendant A corporation: Article 208(3)3(2) of the Civil Procedure Act that is rendered by the defendant C, D, and E: Judgment by the defendant B on February 2, 208(3) of the Civil Procedure Act

A. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and 8 (including additional numbers) as to the cause of the claim, the facts in the separate sheet can be acknowledged. Thus, unless there are special circumstances, the defendant B is a joint and several surety and is jointly and severally liable to pay the remainder of the defendants and the plaintiff the indemnity and the damages for delay.

B. As to the Defendant B’s assertion (1), Defendant B asserts that, without permission, Defendant B could not seek reimbursement on the premise that the said joint and several liability contract is valid, Defendant B could not seek reimbursement on the premise that the said joint and several liability contract is valid. The Plaintiff also did not go through the process of confirming the intent of the Defendant B’s guarantee in the process of concluding the said joint and several liability contract.

(2) The result of each fact-finding on Steburccom Co., Ltd., KSVcom Co., Ltd., and Lburcler Co., Ltd., which led Defendant E to deceiving Defendant B, thereby obtaining an authorized certificate in the name of Defendant B.

It is insufficient to recognize that the above joint and several liability contract was concluded without permission, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the above assertion by Defendant B is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendants jointly and severally concluded that the principal and interest of the indemnity shall be KRW 1,037,572,046 in total, and the principal of the indemnity shall be KRW 1,031,413,60 in total, and the duplicate of the complaint in this case from January 22, 2014.