logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.11.20 2013나6983
물품대금
Text

1. The main part of a judgment in the first instance shall be revoked;

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is with KRW 93,808,000.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 6, 2010, the Defendant entered into a contract for the supply of goods (i.e., the development of a business environment on February 6, 2010 (hereinafter “the development of a business environment”).

From the 600 EP, HP, or Horse power source (hereinafter referred to as “instant 600 EF power source”) waste synthetic resin crushing equipment

(2) On August 25, 2010, Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) supplies of 3 sets.

2) From 400 Epiculator, 400 Epiculor devices (hereinafter referred to as “instant 400 Epiculor”).

) The supply of 2 sets (the place of installation is the gold production factory of Arabic Co., Ltd.

(2) On August 26, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into two contracts for the supply of goods with the Defendant, respectively (hereinafter “instant contract for the supply of goods”), and the terms and conditions of the contract are as follows.

① The instant contract for the supply of oil pressure devices - The term “electric voltage unit” - The scope of construction work ought to be construed as “the production, installation, and trial run of oil pressure unit” and “the production, installation, and trial run of oil pressure unit” and there should be no defects in the normal part of the water.

- Value of 180 million won (excluding value-added tax) - The method of payment on October 10, 2010, respectively, on the date of establishment and completion of inspection: 50% of the value of supply within three days from the date of the contract of the Corporation to be established, 30% of the value of supply at the time of production completion and entry into the area, 20% of the value of supply after the completion of trial operation of the Corporation to be established.

3) The principle of installation and operation of each oil pressure device of this case is as shown in the annexed drawing. 4) The plaintiff at the time.

arrow