The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal lies in an accident in which D was involved while driving a sealed truck.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in misconception of facts.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the Defendant could sufficiently be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant, while operating a light transport vehicle, not a cargo vehicle, caused D, by deceiving the victim Samsung F&M Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) as if the accident occurred while operating a light transport vehicle, not a cargo vehicle, and by deceiving the insurance money.

On August 10, 2012, the Defendant, around August 10, 2012, was involved in an accident involving D’s bridge (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. D’s son, who was at the scene of an accident, entered D into the Emergency Service Center of the Busan Medical Center by using his/her vehicle immediately after the accident occurred (the Defendant also followed), and stated that he/she caused the accident (the investigation record 207 pages), and D entered D in the record of the emergency room on August 10, 2012.

C. Since then, D aggravated symptoms, and later sent D to the Y7:27 Macheon University Hospital on August 11, 2012, and C demanded the Defendant to provide insurance services.

(1) On August 11, 2012, the Defendant received the accident that he was faced with D while driving the cargo in the damaged company only after he was sealed by the injured company.

However, D medical records from August 13, 2012 and from August 24, 2012, 2012 of the Yancheon National University of the Republic of Korea National University of Mancheon-do are being treated at the Seosan Medical Center due to the heat caused by the cryp in the cryp period, but ozing is serious and entered as the internal source through an emergency room.

On September 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) while the instant accident was committed to a staff member of the victimized Company, while said accident was committed by D while said employee was in the aftermath of the truck.