logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2017.12.12 2015가단11048
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. On December 22, 2014, from December 22, 2014 to December 12, 2017, the counterclaim Defendant (Defendant) paid to the counterclaim Plaintiff KRW 17,651,805 and its amount.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer that has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with Nonparty B, setting the insurance period from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015, with respect to the volume of the D car (insurance amount: KRW 200 million) and the large amount (insurance amount: KRW 200 million) with Nonparty B on the D car (hereinafter “instant household insurance contract”).

나. B의 처(妻)인 소외 E은 2014. 12. 22. 14:30경 경주시 외동읍 부근에서 이 사건 가해차량을 운전하여 1차로로 운행 중 운전부주의로 중앙분리대를 충격한 후 2차로로 튕겨져 나갔고, 그로 인하여 당시 2차로에서 운행 중이던 피고 운전의 C 승용차(이하 ‘이 사건 피해차량’이라 한다)의 좌측 전면부와 이 사건 가해차량의 후면부가 충돌하는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)가 발생하였다.

The Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as fluoral finites, and the escape symptoms of conical signboards, which require approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to the instant accident.

C. At the time of the instant accident, the head of the damaged vehicle (YAMAHA YFL-894H) owned by the Defendant was located in the fluor (hereinafter “instant fluor”). D.

In the terms and conditions of the insurance contract of this case, the "repair Costs" item provides for "reasonable expenses incurred in restoring to the state immediately before the accident if reinstatement is possible," and "reasonable expenses incurred in exchanging the amount equivalent to the value of the damage immediately before the accident or the value of the substitute goods of the same kind as the damage immediately before the accident, where the repair costs exceed the value of the damage immediately before the accident or it is impossible to restore to the original state" as the repair costs to be borne by the plaintiff.

(Evidence A) 3. (Evidence A) 4. [Grounds for recognition] unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 10.

arrow