1. The Defendant’s corrective order in the attached Form No. 2011-161 against the Plaintiff on September 16, 201, as well as the corrective order in the attached Form.

. (0.3) 1,871 (7.3) 1,558 (1.3) 94,584 (43.4) 31,782 (48.3) 10,341 (40.3) 52,461 (41.6) direct sale 19,361 (8.8) 1,421 (2.2) 1,071 (4.1), 16,870 (13.2) 2) 16,570 (13.2) 2) 4 4 4 1,578 1,58 1,58 3 1,58 1,58 3 1,58 10 1,58 198 3 198 198 20, 30 19, 30 19, 30 3 5, 196 3 1, 4 1, 1, 3 1, 1, 1, 1, 3

The aggregate of the shares of 84.63% 84.63% 2. 5% 2. 5% 32.6% 32.608 17.07 13.00 32.83.00 100 32.83.00 32.96 17.90 14.85 14.67 10.00 205 32.5% 207 1.5 206 1.15 32.15 207 1.14.38 205 1.15 207 32.19.14 205 1.6 205 1.6 14.15 207 1.305 205 14.15 208 31.208

The ratio of pure self-employed oil stations among the distribution networks of each oil refinery is higher in order of plaintiffs, modern, SK, and GS, and in particular, GS is operated as direct oil stations with at least 20% of the total affiliated oil stations, and it is the highest portion of direct oil stations.

The ratio of each oil station of each oil refinery shall be as follows:

(e)in the country;