Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 209, the Defendant, without authority, entered the D Office located in Kimhae-si, in the agreement form of computer with the purpose of exercising the right, “mixed”, “2.4 x 6M”, “15 million won per unit” in the quantity column, “one hundred and fifty million won per unit (Won 18,000,000 won),” in the item column of the special agreement, “all of the electrical facilities”, “50% of the down payment date and amount” in Article 3 (Payment Terms) 50% of the down payment date and amount column on June 27, 2008, “10,000,000 won”, “20,000,000 won and 20,000,000 won and 80,000,000 won and 20,000,000 won and 20,000,000,000 won and 20,00,00.
From December 2, 2012 to January 2013, 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against “I” and “J” in the District High Court of Brazil (BC) in the Canadian BBC, and submitted the forged contract to the employee in charge of the name in charge, as such, as if the contract was duly completed.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged one chapter of the Conact Contract in the name of G, which is a private document related to rights and duties, and exercised it.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the police statement related to G;
1. Each police investigation report (verification of the address of the Korean company, verification of rubber name plates, and seal of rubber name plates kept by the complainants);
1. Certification of closure of business, certification of tax payment, agreement on contact, application of Acts and subordinate statutes to e-mail;
1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;
1. The aggravated Criminal Act for concurrent crimes.