beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 17,467,842 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 7,486,218 to Plaintiff B; and each of them, from February 10, 2018 to October 10, 2019.
Reasons
1. Details of ruling;
A. A. Outline of the rearrangement project - Business Name: C Housing redevelopment rearrangement project - Business Area: D Day (48,204.9 square meters): Defendant - Project implementer: The public notice of the authorization for the implementation of the project on May 27, 2015: The public notice of the implementation of the project: The Defendant - the public notice of Ansan-si on May 27, 2015 - The Plaintiffs share each of 7/10 shares (hereinafter “the instant obstacles”) and 7/10 shares (Plaintiff A), 3/10 shares (Plaintiff B) of the building, etc. indicated in the attached list on the ground in the instant rearrangement zone.
B. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on December 26, 2017 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): The instant land and obstacles - the date of expropriation: - The date of expropriation: the appraisal corporation on February 9, 2018: G and H
C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on August 23, 2018 (hereinafter “instant objection”): Plaintiff A 585,618,040 won (i.e., share in the instant land in KRW 103,696,390), Plaintiff B250,979,160 won (i.e., share in the instant land in KRW 206,537,850) - An appraisal corporation: I and J. J.
D. The court appraiser K’s appraisal (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - Compensation for losses: Plaintiff A 603,085,882 won (i.e., shares in the instant land in KRW 493,353,882), Plaintiff B258,465,378 won (= KRW 211,437,00 shares in the instant land in KRW 211,437,00), and Plaintiff B 258,378 won (i.e., KRW 47,00 shares in the instant obstacles in KRW 47,028,378) in the preservation case of evidence requested by the Plaintiffs (U.S. District Court 2018Da3306)
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiffs' objection of this case and the court's appraisal of this case were excessively low compared to the actual compensation cases in neighboring areas, and they assessed the value of the land of this case.