A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on September 28, 2015, the Defendant: (b) 11:35, the Defendant: (c) was a victim E, a victim E, who was fluent, was fluent, without boarding and leaving the fluence at the top of the Do-dong branch of the Do-dong, Ulle-gun, Ulle-gun, Ulle-gun, Ulle-gun, U.S., which is located in the front of the Do-dong branch; and (d) the Defendant

D. On the ground that the victim said that he was “d.”, the victim expressed his bath as “sulpe, sule,” and batddd the victim’s bat with her hand, and suld the victim’s bat.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. Around September 28, 2015, at the same place as before and after September 11:5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to F on the ground that the Defendant, upon receiving a report that the Defendant carried out a fighting match as set forth in the preceding paragraph, the police officer of the Ulsan District Police Station G police box called “F” used plastic chairs at the place to restrain the Defendant from passing a noise to his players; and (b) attempted to get the head of the said F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the security management.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties to H, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, voluntarily accompanied the spawn to a G police box located in Ulleung-gun I, and returned home to the Defendant’s house located in theJ. While returning home, the Defendant was likely to cause a safety accident to the Defendant, and police officers, such as the superior police officer of the Ulleung Police Station G police box, were accompanied by the Defendant.

On September 28, 2015, around 13:42 on September 28, 2015, the Defendant wants to kill the police officer in front of the house of the above Defendant.

B. They are gathered due to interference with the performance of official duties.

When influence, the death shall be discarded.

As the word “,” assaulted the part of the instant H, i.e., destroying the part of the instant H once more than the next H.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the security management.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. H, F, E, K, and C.