The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) in light of the various sentencing conditions in this case, the punishment sentenced by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Examining the various sentencing conditions of the instant case, the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as: (a) the Defendant appears to have recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime; and (c) the Defendant appears to have drawn up a letter of intimidation in the caric book in the condition that it is so serious and difficult to adjust decentralization; and (d) the Defendant was suffering from marriage and divorce twice; and (c) there are circumstances under which the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes was applied.

However, the crime of this case was committed against the victim for the purpose of retaliation on December 22, 2016, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months or more due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (defence, etc.) on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and was serving in prison. The crime of this case is committed against the same victim by preparing a letter containing the following contents: “packer without any sound voice,” “I am satch with the inside,” “I am satch with the inside,” “I am satch with the inside,” and “I am satch with the outside,” and “I am am satch with the outside,” and thus, by taking account of the motive and circumstance of the crime, repetition, and relationship between the defendant and the victim. In particular, retaliation crime was committed not only by infringement of the victim’s legal interests, but also by the criminal investigation agency and court, arrest of criminals, and sexual harm to the victim.