logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.29 2013누20297
전공상추가상이처불인정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the army on January 29, 1979 and served in the 133 Central Headquarters Equipment of the Army Armed Forces in the Army.

On September 2, 1981, at around 15:30 on September 2, 1981, the Plaintiff: (a) obstructed electric power sources connected to the water supply station connected to a telegraph station; and (b) caused electric damage (i.e., image) on both sides and on the chest wall of the front bank, due to an accident that was cut down to the ground below 15 meters (hereinafter “instant accident”).

The Plaintiff received hospitalized treatment by October 16, 1981 after he was sent to the National Armed Forces Integrated Hospital via the 59 post-Saong Hospital, and was discharged on November 12, 1981.

B. The result of the first system survey conducted on September 2, 1981 on the clinical records of the military hospital in the course of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at issue: The results of the second system survey conducted on the same day as that of the clinical records of the hospital at the time of the aftermath of 59 on September 2, 1981: No 200: no climatic or any visual disorder; no climatic or visual disorder; no climatic or visual disorder; no blimatic-marism exists; no climatic-consissis; no climatic-consissisism exists; no 2) the progress records of the national armed forces hospital at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of September 2, 1981: The results of the physical examination conducted on Sep. 2, 1981: the overall shape of the telegraph/type-type-type, the name-type, no b

C. Around 2010, the Plaintiff filed for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State and filed for registration with the Defendant, asserting that the instant accident occurred different from the “electric image”, “salvine snow”, and “brut inconvenience”.

On May 25, 2010, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State") with respect to "electric image title 2-3, 15% (not on the front wall and left-hand side)" and the left-hand amount and the part (after the duplication of duplicative and partial duplicative duplicing)".

arrow