1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part demanding confirmation of the absence of each insurance claim shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff and defendant A.

1. We examine the legitimacy of the claim on the part of the claim for confirmation of non-existence of insurance money ex officio.

In addition to seeking confirmation of non-existence of insurance claim, as long as the plaintiff seeks confirmation of invalidity of each insurance contract as stated in the Disposition No. 2, which is a premise, there is no benefit to seek confirmation of non-existence of insurance claim.

This part of the claim is unlawful because there is no benefit of confirmation.

2. Determination as to the remainder of claims (a claim seeking confirmation of invalidity of a contract)

(a) The indication of the claim (attached Form 2) is as shown in the corresponding part of the cause of the claim;

B. Articles 208(3)1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act of the judgment without holding any pleadings

3. As such, the part of the claim for confirmation of non-existence of each insurance claim in the lawsuit of this case is unlawful, and thus, the remaining claims are reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.