logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.01.15 2019가단76211
교육비등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff and the defendant completed the marriage report on November 29, 199, and among them, C (D) and E (F) were minor children.

B. On October 14, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) concluded a divorce on October 14, 2014; (b) at the time, the Plaintiff agreed to bear the child support until children reach the age of majority.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 3 evidence, Eul 2 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. In addition to the child support that the Defendant agreed with the Plaintiff at the time of the divorce between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff KRW 800,000 per month to the Plaintiff’s educational institute expenses, teaching materials expenses, and communication expenses (hereinafter “educational expenses”) until his/her children reach the age of majority, and that his/her children are responsible for tuition fees and university registration fees (hereinafter “school expenses”) until his/her children graduate from high school and university.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 2 million among the educational expenses accrued from February 2016 to September 2017, and KRW 800,000,000 per month from October 2017 to October 10, 2023, and KRW 2,127,60,00 for high school fees in 2017 and 2,127,00 for 20 years from October 2017 to October 2023.

B. Each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 4 through 6, and 8 (including each number), alone, is insufficient to recognize that the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff educational expenses and school expenses as alleged by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.

arrow