Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving Cone Star A.S. car.

On November 20, 2013, around 05:36, the Defendant proceeded at an insular speed at a two-lane distance from the side of the Dong-dong Gwangju Bank, along the bus platform that is adjacent to D's off-line, which is adjacent to the D's off-line, which is located in C'ri-dong at the summer-si.

At the time, the front door was opened with a new wall, and there was a crosswalk installed at the front door, and thus, there was a duty of care to check whether there was a person engaging in driving of a motor vehicle to reduce speed and to see well the front door, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim E (the age of 66) who cross the crosswalk from the left side by his negligence and did not discover the victim E (the age of 66) and got the body of the above victim to go beyond the ground.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from an injury to the victim by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, i.e., blood transfusions without an open room in the head requiring approximately six weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the defendant was under the unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant suffered serious injury to the victim by shocking the victim of the crosswalk, but not agreed with the victim. However, the fact that the defendant is under the contrary, that the defendant is under the age of 73, that the vehicle of the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, that the vehicle of the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and deposited three million won for the victim, and that the crime of injury by occupational negligence is committed two times before about