The Defendants are not guilty. The Defendants are not guilty, and the summary of each verdict of innocence is publicly announced.

1. The summary of the facts of prosecution is the person who is the representative F with interest interest of the union members of the victim E Housing Redevelopment Development and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “victim E”). Defendant B is the person who proposes the interest G group of the victim union members, and H is the president of the victim association.

A. On December 3, 2016, the Defendants: (a) around the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office for “G” apartment housing; (b) on December 14, 2016, the Defendant’s reappointment session was a lawful and effective general assembly as stipulated in the articles of incorporation; and (c) on December 14, 2016, the competent Seodaemun-gu Office prohibits the illegal general assembly using OS staff; (d) however, the instant reappointment session using the computer web mail date, which does not have an effect that is not recognized by the old office; and (e) saving the OS expense required to suspend the reappointment session without any validity that is not valid by the previous office; and (e) saving the amount of OS expense that is required by approximately KRW 1,000 members, respectively.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to spread false information and thereby interfered with the convening of the general meeting of the victim association.

B. On December 4, 2016, the Defendants were within the redevelopment area located in the Seodaemun-gu J around December 4, 2016, and the fact is a legitimate and effective general assembly as stipulated in the articles of incorporation, and the competent Seodaemun-gu Office only prohibits the illegal general assembly using the OS staff, and did not receive a written resolution for the purpose of forging the OS. However, Defendant B’s reappointment general assembly on December 14, 2012 is null and void.

The Seodaemun-gu Office of a person who has the right to permit and permit shall not recognize the reappointment general meeting and shall not proceed with the project because he/she is unable to obtain future approval for change.

The procedure for submitting a written resolution was in violation of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Election Management Regulations for forgery, and the letter of a written resolution in which OS personnel receive only the name and also to forge it.

The notice of the contents of the "" shall be drawn up, and the defendant.