A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and a fine of KRW 5,00,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner who rents an officetel in the vicinity of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and operates a non-tradeless commercial entertainment business.

From March 10, 2017 to May 29, 2017, the Defendant reported commercial sex acts posted on “C,” etc., an adult Internet website at “Seoul Seocho-gu Officetel” and “C,” etc., which were found in D, E (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) and the Defendant had a female sex trafficking, such as F, who was employed in advance after receiving payment of KRW 70,00 or KRW 200,00 as the price for commercial sex acts from males, such as sex buyers, such as F, F, the suspension of indictment on the same day), G (n, 36 years of age, G, and the suspension of indictment on the same day), to have the said female sexual intercourse with the said females on one occasion.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F, G, D, or E;

1. Investigation report (the confirmation of a lease contract at the site of occurrence and the specification of the suspect);

1. Investigation report (related to the analysis of digital sirens with two suspect Handphones) (applicable to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of arranging sexual traffic);

1. Imprisonment with prison labor and a fine under Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging of selective sexual traffic;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the accused who recognized the facts charged.

There is no history of punishment for sexual traffic intermediary business.

It seems that the scale of business is not large and criminal proceeds are not high.

In addition, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments in this case.