1. The plaintiff's supplementary intervenor's application for participation shall be permitted.

2. Part concerning the conjunctive claim of the first instance judgment

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an owner on the register of 1,031 shares of each site listed in the separate sheet. The Defendants are the owners on the register of 1,231 shares of each site listed in the separate sheet, and the Defendants are the persons possessing the instant building as listed below. 2) The Defendants are the owners of each corresponding part of the instant building (hereinafter referred to as “the corresponding part”) of each of the instant building, as well as the shares in the relevant site (as the ownership of each of the Defendant is about 15 square meters in terms of the sale contract).

Defendant non-high-rise 1 1st floor purchased from CA No. 101 2nd floor, 101st floor D 101st floor D 101st floor D 101st floor D 103rd floor D 101st floor D 101st, 43rd floor M 101st 10th, 43rd floor M on July 13, 2009, 53rd 2nd 2nd 201st 2nd 101st 1st 74th 2nd 201st 201st 201st 201st 2nd 201st 209, 2nd 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2009, 3rd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2009, 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd 2nd 2nd 3rd 3rd 2nd 3rd 2nd 2nd 2nd .

B) B. B. AG’s construction of the instant building: (a) around July 1987, the land was divided into an AI large 1,231 square meters and AJ, K, and AL, and the said AI large 1,231 square meters and the said AI large 1,231 square meters and the relevant land was subdivided into each site listed in the attached Table on February 12, 2015.

Before the division, 1,231 square meters and each site listed in the separate sheet is in the case.