1. Around 10:00 on June 20, 2014, the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff) operated the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) with a half seat of 20 in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a legal entity operating a health club in Ansan-si, and the Defendant was a former member of the Plaintiff’s health club until June 20, 2014. 2) The Defendant visited the Plaintiff’s health club on June 20, 2014, and around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the Plaintiff continued to operate the club at a speed of 6.7 km/h of the city’s speed even after the use of the non-member; and (b) the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the suspension of boarding machines, which continued to operate the club at a speed of 6.7 km/h of the city’s speed (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (c) the Defendant suffered from the injury, such as the extension of the frame near the left-hand part of the 5th part.

3) Although the Plaintiff, who operates a health club, has a duty to leave the members who completed the movement and prevent them from sustaining any other members due to the sports organization, the Plaintiff was not neglected and did not take measures to suspend the operation of the sports club and thereby the non-member who completed the movement in violation of such duty and thereby suffered the above injury by the Defendant, which goes beyond the mining machine. 4) Accordingly, the Defendant received a fixed line of the 5th left-hand part of the number from the B Hospital located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, on June 20, 2014, after receiving the fixed line of the 5th half of the number from the left-hand side of the B Hospital located in Ansan-si, and from June 20, 2014 to the same year.

7.3. From July 14, 2014 to the same year.

7. The same year from August 11, 2014, until 28.

8. By December 23, 201, two hospitals were hospitalized in C Hospital, and from September 15, 2014 to October 13, 2014, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff is responsible for compensating the defendant for damages caused by the accident of this case.

C. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the evidence presented prior to setting-off of negligence and limitation of liability, the Defendant appears to have sufficiently known the location and status of the sports organization located in the Plaintiff’s health club for ten years.